The relative efficacy of phenothiazines for the treatment of acute migraine: a meta-analysis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND Ranges of agents are used in the emergency departments to treat migraine headache. Some experts suggest that phenothiazines are among the most effective; clinical trials have been small with varied results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relative effectiveness of phenothiazines compared with placebo and other active agents for the treatment of acute migraine. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane database, and international clinical trial registers for randomized controlled trials comparing parenteral phenothiazines with placebo or another active parenteral agent for treatment of acute migraine in adults. The primary outcome was relief of headache, and secondary outcome was clinical success. Analysis was for phenothiazines vs placebo, pooled other active agents, and metoclopramide for each outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and pooled by using a random effects model (RevMan v5). RESULTS Thirteen trials were appropriate and had available data. Phenothiazines were compared with placebo in 5 trials and to another active agent in 10 (metoclopramide 4). Phenothiazine was more effective than placebo for headache relief (OR 15.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.57-29.82) and clinical success (OR 8.92, 95% CI 4.08-19.51). Phenothiazines were more effective than other agents combined (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25-3.31) and the metoclopramide subgroup (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.29-3.92) for clinical success, but no differences were found for headache relief. The clinical success rate of phenothiazines was 78% (95% CI 74-82). CONCLUSION Phenothiazines are more effective than placebo for the treatment of migraine headache and have higher rates of clinical success than other agents against which they have been compared.
منابع مشابه
Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Sodium valproate (SV) has been approved for migraine prophylaxis and its intravenous form is used to treat acute migraine attacks. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous SV and subcutaneous Sumatriptan in managing acute migraine attacks. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial divided 90 patients into two groups: one group received 400 mg of intravenous SV a...
متن کاملTenecteplase versus reteplase in acute myocardial infarction: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death throughout the world. One of the standard approaches to treatment of AMI is fibrinolysis. The study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of tenecteplase versus reteplase through network meta-analysis for AMI. Methods: Randomized trials were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, a...
متن کاملTenecteplase versus reteplase in acute myocardial infarction: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death throughout the world. One of the standard approaches to treatment of AMI is fibrinolysis. The study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of tenecteplase versus reteplase through network meta-analysis for AMI. Methods: Randomized trials were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, a...
متن کاملEfficacy of probiotic use in acute rotavirus diarrhea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Probiotic therapies with different strains demonstrated some beneficial effects, although some studies did not show any significant effects. This study assessed systematically the current knowledge on the effect of probiotic bacteria on duration of in acute rotavirus diarrhea in children compared with control. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR) and Ov...
متن کاملEfficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in Depression Disorder: A meta-analysis
A meta-analysis[m1] of Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment on Depression Disorder Abstract: Objective: Meta-analysis defines the rate of effect size of interventions by integrating the obtained results from different studies. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment in depression disorder. Methods: Totally 10 studies from 15 st...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Headache
دوره 49 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009